Delafield v. J. K. Armsby Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendant, The J. K. Armsby Company, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiffs, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 3d day of April, 1908, upon the verdict of a jury, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the loth day of January, 1908, denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial made upon the minutes.
1Opinion of the Court
Ingraham, J.:
This action was brought to recover damages sustained by the plaintiffs in consequence of a breach by the defendant of a contract' by which the defendant sold to the plaintiffs 28,000 cases of Ned Alaska salmon. The questions of fact in this case were submitted to the jury by a very full and satisfactory charge to which the defendant took no exception except in relation to the measure of damages adopted by the trial court, which is the main question presented upon this appeal.
The facts as testified to hy the plaintiffs were as follows: The defendant was the sole representative in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wakeman v. Wheeler & Wilson Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Booth v. . Spuyten Duyvil Rolling Mill Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Messmore v. New York Shot & Lead Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1869
- Delafield v. J. K. Armsby Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
3Cited by23 opinions
- Czarnikow-Rionda Co. v. Federal Sugar Refining Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Town of Tonawanda v. Stapell, Mumm & Beals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
- Mitsubishi Shoji Kaisha, Ltd. v. DavisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1922
- Architector Co. v. SlomonNew York Supreme Court · 1948
- Broadway & Ninety-Fourth Street, Inc. v. C. & L. Lunch Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1921
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.