Legal Opinion

Roger Williams National Bank v. Groton Manufacturing Co.

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided March 16, 1889PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Assumpsit. On demurrers to the pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtMatteson, J.

This is an action of assumpsit on eight promissory notes, all of which are of the tenor following, except that they bear different dates :

“13,000.

Providence, E. I., September 10, 1883.

“ Four months after date we promise to pay to the order of Amos D. Smith & Co., Three Thousand and Dollars at Eoger Williams National Bank. Value received.
“Groton Manufacturing Co.,

C. M. and W. S. Smith, Agents.

“ No. Due January 10, 1883.
“ Indorsed, Amos D. Smith & Co.
“Francis M. Smith, ) “ Charles Morris Smith, )

Trustees Estate of Amos D. Smith.”

The action is brought under the statute against both the maker and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Davis' AdministratrixSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Thacher v. DinsmoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809
  3. Story v. ElliotCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1827
  4. Forster v. FullerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809
  5. New v. . NicollNew York Court of Appeals · 1878

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Greenough v. Tax Assessors of NewportSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Yonce v. Miners Memorial Hospital Ass'nDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1958
  3. Sheehan v. RichardsonDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2004
  4. Hunt v. ListenbergerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
  5. Allegheny Tank Car Co. v. CulbertsonDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1923

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API