United States v. Farina
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judge.
The defendants Farina and Di-Palermo were convicted under all three counts of the indictment mentioned above. The defendant Sperdutto was acquitted under the first count, charging him with possession of counterfeit currency, but convicted under the second and third counts. Farina does not question the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict against him. DiPalermo and Sperdutto each made weak contentions that the evidence was insufficient to convict. It is however perfectly plain that there was direct proof against DiPalermo and that his argument as…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gomila v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
- Pettine v. Territory of New MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
- Marshall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1912
- Griggs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1908
- Owens v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1904
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Leavitt v. AraveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. CrosbyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- State v. SchiappaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Clyde L. Schaffer and James H. Devenny v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- State v. CariSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.