Legal Opinion

SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY v. BERGEN COUNTY PROTECT AND RESCUE FOUNDATION

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided April 24, 2024No. 2:22-cv-03338Unknown

1Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE : COMPANY, : Civil Action No. 22-3338-JKS-AME : Plaintiff, : : OPINION and ORDER v. : : BERGEN COUNTY PROTECT AND : RESCUE FOUNDATION, et al., : : Defendants. : : ESPINOSA, Magistrate Judge This matter is before the Court on the motion by defendant Cindy Aleman (“Aleman”) for leave to file an Amended Answer and Counterclaims, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2) [D.E. 35]. Plaintiff Scottsdale Insurance Company (“Scottsdale ”) opposes the motion. Defendants Bergen County Protect &…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  5. Edward Arthur v. Maersk, Inc. D/B/A Maersk Line Ltd. Dyn Corp. Technical Services D/B/A Dyn Marine Services the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API