Legal Opinion

Tumlinson v. First Victoria National Bank

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided August 31, 1993No. 13-92-285-CVPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SEERDEN, Justice.

By a single point of error, appellants Ruby Lee Tumlinson and her son, Maxie, claim that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment to First Victoria National Bank. We affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.

Appellants filed suit against First Victoria National Bank for wrongfully paying forty-five forged checks totaling over $32,000. Between September 1989 and September 1990, some forty-five checks were presented to the Bank, drawn on appellants’ joint account. The Bank paid the checks and charged appellants’ account. Most of the checks were between $500…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. La Sara Grain Co. v. First National Bank of MercedesTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Burns v. ThomasTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Exchange Bank & Trust Co. v. Kidwell Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  5. McDowell v. Dallas Teachers Credit Union, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. American Airlines Employees Federal Credit Union v. MartinTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Canfield v. Bank One, Texas, N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2001
  3. ADC Rig Services, Inc. v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2009
  4. Community Bank & Trust, SSB v. Fleck, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2000
  5. American Airlines Employees Federal Credit Union v. MartinTexas Supreme Court · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API