Legal Opinion
Cauble v. Beals
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided August 10, 1981No. 13118PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EASLEY, Chief Justice.
The Caubles (Cauble) sued the Beals for ejectment from a strip of land claimed by Cauble. Beals counterclaimed for quiet title on the grounds of adverse possession and acquiescence in a common boundary. The district court quieted title in Beals on the grounds of acquiescence and estoppel. Cauble appeals. We reverse.
We discuss whether the trial court’s findings of acquiescence and estoppel are supported by substantial evidence.
Cauble’s land adjoins Beals’ on the north boundary of Beals’ property. Cauble’s tract was previously owned by the State of New Mexico for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Capo v. Century Life InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
- Woodburn v. GrimesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1954
- Tresemer v. Albuquerque Public School DistrictNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
- McBride v. AllisonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- Kilcrease v. CampbellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lee v. KonradAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
- Deaton v. GutierrezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
- Stone v. RhodesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
- Gonzales v. Public Employees Retirement BoardNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992
- Gonzales v. Public Employees Retirement BoardNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992