McMahen v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.
The complaint in this case declares against two defendants jointly in three of the counts, and against each of them separately in the other counts respectively. Such a complaint violates a fundamental rule of action and procedure at I9.W.
In our early case of Childress v. McCullough (1837) 5 Port. 54, 62 (30 Am. Dec. 549), it was said:
“It is a well-recognized rule that courts of law will not take cognizance of distinct and separate claims or liabilities of several persons in one suit, though standing in the same relative situations.”
So in 20 R. C. L. 677, § 16, the rule is stated thus:
“Where…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Childress v. M'CulloughSupreme Court of Alabama · 1837
3Cited by10 opinions
- O'Dell v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
- Birmingham Bar Ass'n v. Phillips & MarshSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
- Box v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Roberts Construction Co. v. HenrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
- Bank of Moulton v. RankinAlabama Court of Appeals · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.