Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Kelley v. Cooper

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 22, 2013No. A13A0982Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partPhipps, Chief Judge

I concur in Divisions 1 and 2 of the majority opinion. I respectfully dissent from Divisions 3, 4, and 5.

1. With regard to Division 3, I do not agree that the evidence showed that Kelley committed a fraud upon Cooper. “The elements of a fraud action are an intentional false representation by the defendant designed to induce the plaintiff to act or refrain from acting, upon which the plaintiff justifiably relies, resulting in damage to the plaintiff.”6

Although “[fjraud may be proved by slight circumstances, and whether a misrepresentation is fraudulent and intended to deceive is generally a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. KEN-MAR CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. v. BowenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  2. ALDWORTH CO., INC. v. EnglandSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
  3. Jeff Goolsby Homes Corp. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  4. Mallen v. MallenSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
  5. Zieve v. HairstonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API