Legal Opinion

Ford Lumber Co. v. Cornett

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 26, 1912PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Letcher Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

William Rogers Clay,

COMMISSIONER

Affirming.

Appellant, Ford Lumber Company, bought some timber from one Asher, branded with the letter “A.” By mistake, it is claimed, it cut several trees so branded on an adjoining tract, which were not included in their deed from Asher. The timber so cut was poplar, and when cut and sawed, made about 116 logs.

W. W. Cornett brought this action of claim and delivery to recover the logs, or their value which he alleged to be $451.58, and $100 for their detention. He executed *458bond as required by the Civil Code, and tbe logs were delivered to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hicks v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  2. Poynter v. PhelpsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
  3. Baustic v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. La Cook Farm Land Co. v. Northern Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  2. Floyd Elkhorn Consolidated Collieries v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  3. Dodson v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  4. Kenmont Coal Co. v. HallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  5. Vanbever v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API