Legal Opinion

POA Co. v. Findlay Township Zoning Hearing Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 27, 1998No. 54 W.D. Appeal Docket 1997PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ZAPPALA, Justice.

Appellant, POA Company, appeals a Commonwealth Court order reversing the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County which reversed the Findlay Township Zoning Hearing Board’s decision denying its application for a use variance. For the reasons that follow, we reverse.

Prior to the commencement of this action, Appellant owned a 5.5 acre parcel of land in the Township which abutted State Route 60 along its northerly border. Appellant was unable to access its property from Route 60. To the east, Appellant’s property abuts a tract of land presently owned by…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Valley View Civic Ass'n v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Girsh AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. Pyzdrowski v. Pittsburgh Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. Hasage v. PHILA. ZONING BD. OF ADJ.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  5. Hasage v. Philadelphia Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pap's A.M. v. City of ErieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Tricker v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Leistner v. Borough of Franklin ParkCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Gennimi v. Township of Stroud, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Monroe County2010
  5. Kneebone, R. v. Lutz, P., Aplts.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API