(PC) Gooden v. Johnson
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTHONY GOODEN, No. 2:24-cv-00023 DC SCR P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 TRACY JOHNSON, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action under
42 U.S.C. § 18
1983. Before the court are plaintiff’s complaint for screening (ECF No. 1) and motion to proceed 19 in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2). Because plaintiff paid the filing fee on November 22, 2024, the 20 court denies the motion to proceed in forma pauperis as moot. As described…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.