Legal Opinion

Nicoletti v. VEITCH

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 4, 1963No. Appeal, 176PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Cohen,

This action in quo warranto was brought by plaintiff, Stephen Nicoletti, to question the right of James Whyno to hold the office of borough councilman. The undisputed facts show that a vacancy occurred on the Bristol Borough Council by virtue of the resignation of one of its members. At the regular monthly meeting of council held on July 9, 1962, Nicoletti and Why-no were nominated to fill the vacancy. A roll call was taken and Nicoletti received a majority of the votes. The result of the vote was accordingly entered in the minutes of the meeting.

Subsequently, the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. v. BitnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. Jones v. Schuylkill Light, Heat and Power Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Fox v. ChaceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Wilkes-Barre Connecting Railroad v. Kingston BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Commonwealth ex rel. McChesney v. Diamond National BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Zimmerman v. KleimanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Whale's Tale, Inc. v. City of Pittsburgh Zoning Administrator, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API