Legal Opinion

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Fox v. Chace

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 13, 1961No. Appeal, 114PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Eagen,

This case- involves the legal right of the appellant, Arthur- A. Chace, to hold, by appointment, the office of councilman of the Borough of' Brookhaven, in the County of Delaware. In an action of quo warranto, the lower court held his appointment to the office illegal and of no effect. Chace, appealed.

The issue was tried before the court without a jury. The facts are few and not in dispute.

At a meeting of the eou-ncil involved, an elected member submitted his resignation which was accepted. Immediately, as disclosed by the official minutes of the meeting, the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. BallinSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Scudder v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. McDonald v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Place v. BD. OF ADJUST. OF BOROUGH OF SADDLE RIVERSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  5. State Ex Rel. Rylands v. PinkermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Smetanka v. Borough of Ambridge, PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Woodhull v. ManahanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
  3. City of Keene v. Gerry's Cash Market, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
  4. ALMY v. Borough of WilkinsburgCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Zimmerman v. KleimanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API