Legal Opinion

PPG Industries, Inc. v. Pilkington Plc

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided July 9, 1993No. CIV 92-753-TUC-WDBPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

WILLIAM D. BROWNING, Chief Judge.

Pending before the Court are: (1) the December 18, 1992 Motion of Defendant Pilkington pic (“Pilkington”) to Dismiss Counts Four and Five; and (2) Pilkington’s December 18, 1992 Motion to Stay Proceedings and Compel Arbitration or Dismiss.

ORDER AND OPINION

I. Factual and Procedural Background

Plaintiff, PPG Industries, Inc. (“PPG”), has filed a Complaint alleging antitrust violations by Defendants Pilkington and Libbey-Ow-ens-Ford Company (“LOF”). The allegations describe “a wheel-like scheme in which Pilkington operates at the hub to monopolize the markets…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Simula, Inc. v. Autoliv, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  2. Simula, Inc. v. Autoliv, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  3. Jung v. Association of American Medical CollegesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API