Legal Opinion
Dunham's Food & Drink, Inc. v. City of West St. Paul
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 31, 1995No. C9-94-1559PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
Appellants Dunham’s Food & Drink, Inc., et al. appeal from the district court’s dismissal of their claim against the City of West St. Paul (city). Appellants contend that the fee a city may charge for a liquor license is narrowly restricted by statute to the dollar costs of issuing and directly enforcing the license. Minn.Stat. § 340A.408, subd. 2(a) (1992). They further argue that the district court erred in determining that the city’s costs of issuing and enforcing liquor licenses exceeded revenue from license fees. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellants are seven West St. Paul…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- State Ex Rel. Beaulieu v. City of Mounds ViewSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- Minneapolis Street Railway Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- State Ex Rel. Remick v. ClousingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Lyons v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- U S West Communications, Inc. v. City of Redwood FallsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997