Legal Opinion
United States v. Michael Vincent Lanese, Michael Vincent Lanese, A/K/A "Vinnie" and Thomas Romano, A/K/A "t.r.,"
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided November 29, 1989No. 1374, 1379, Dockets 89-1079, 89-1133PublishedCited by 71 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RE, Chief Judge:
Defendants-appellants, Michael Vincent Lanese and Thomas Romano, appeal from judgments of conviction following a jury trial in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut. Lanese and Romano were convicted of conspiring to “use ... extortionate means ... to collect any extension of credit,” and “us[ing] ... extortionate means to collect any extension of credit,” both in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 894(a)(1) (1982). Lanese was sentenced to 78 months’ imprisonment to be followed by three years’ supervised release, and fined $25,000. Romano was sentenced to 72…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Juventino Mejia-OroscoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Bertie Alexander WrightCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Stanley Friedman, Michael Lazar, Lester Shafran, and Marvin Kaplan, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Jose LoyaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Alvaro HerreraCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- United States v. Joseph Pitre Edwyn Pitre Angel M. Otero Richard PitreCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Joe Luis SaucedoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. David StevensCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Carlos M. PerdomoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Ramon Rodriguez-Gonzalez and Reuben Vargas-SantanasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.