Legal Opinion

Schettino v. Alter

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1986PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Beatrice S. Burstein, J.

Defendants Becker and Livreri seek judgment dismissing this action, pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7), on the ground the complaint fails to state a cause of action. The remaining defendants seek judgment on the same grounds as well as on the ground that as to them this court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over this action (CPLR 3211 [a] [2]). The motions are consolidated for purposes of determination.

The court first turns its attention to the issue of subject matter jurisdiction. Defendants Alter, Ashe, Hynes, Mannion, Manuszewski, Palermo and Seiff…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Stukuls v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Psaty v. DuryeaNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  3. Wiener v. WeintraubNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Glassman v. GlassmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
  5. Sinhogar v. ParryNew York Court of Appeals · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Opn. No., New York Attorney General Reports2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API