Seymour v. Bank of Thomasville
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.
1. Where two or more persons sign a note apparently as joint principals, and there is nothing in the instrument indicating that ' some of the makers are principals and others sureties, in an action by the payee against all the makers as joint principals, one of the makers may plead that under an agreement resting entirely in parol, which was known to the payee at the time the note was signed, he was only a surety for the others; and that he was discharged from liability to the payee by an act of the payee, after execution of the note, which increased the risk of the surety. Bank of St. Marys…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Toomer v. DickersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1867
- Bank of St. Marys v. Mumford & TysonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1849
- Stubbs v. GoodallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1848
- Collins v. EverettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1848
- Bank of Lumpkin County v. JustusSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Pickett v. Bank of EllijaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
- Deems v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Northcutt v. CroweCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Cheshire v. HightowerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- Hopkins v. KingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.