Legal Opinion
Fry v. Equitable Trust Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided June 13, 1933No. Calendar 37,319PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.
This is mandamus to require repayment in full, as a preferred claim, of a deposit of State moneys.
The Equitable Trust Company is in a condition of suspended animation, pending reorganization or receivership, in charge of conservators appointed by the banking commissioner, with the consent of the governor, under Act No. 32, Pub. Acts 1933. The conservators have refused the demand of the governor, State treasurer, and attorney general, made in behalf of the State, for immediate payment of a deposit of $10,000 of State moneys, made by tbe State treasurer and secured by a corporate surety…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Davis v. Elmira Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Cook County National Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- United States F. & G. Co. v. BramwellOregon Supreme Court · 1923
- Green v. GravesMichigan Supreme Court · 1844
- South Philadelphia State Bank's InsolvencySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Independence Ins. v. Independent Life & Acc. Ins.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
- Braun v. McPhersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Sholtz Ex Rel. Duval CountySupreme Court of Florida · 1935
- Re WhiteNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1939
- Reichert v. Metropolitan Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.