Sample v. King
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtLester, J.
The parties to this action occupy the same position as in the trial court.
The p’aintiffs brought an action against the defendant in the district court of Tulsa county. Trial was had, which resulted in a judgment, from which the plaintiffs appeal.
Motion for new trial on account of the alleged newly discovered evidence was filed by the plaintiffs. This motion was overruled by the court, to which the' plain'iffs excepted.
It appeared that on May 28.- 1924, A. J. Pettit and wife, the owners of 40 acres of land, executed four separate oil and gas leases, each covering ten acres, in favor of A. A.…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Bardon v. EndejanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Hubbard v. StottsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Farmers National Bank of Sulphur v. BellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936