People v. Maxfield
California Supreme Court
1DissentShenk, J.
I dissent.
The complaint does not allege that in the period between the deed to the state and the redemption of the lands the state sought to obtain possession or that it entered into any agreements for the rental of the property, or exercised any rights of ownership conferred upon it by statute. Nevertheless, the state, after redemption, seeks an accounting and recovery of rents collected by the redemptioner during that period. What the rights of the state may be while title to unredeemed property remains in the state is not involved here.
Upon the redemption of the property the deed to the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Board of Comm'rs of Tippecanoe Cty. v. LucasSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Buck v. CantyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Mercury Herald Co. v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Anglo California National Bank of San Francisco v. LelandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- People v. GustafsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.