Legal Opinion

New York Cement Co. v. Consolidated Rosendale Cement Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1902PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action for an injunction.

1Opinion of the CourtBetts, J.

In an action brought by this plaintiff a short time since against this defendant and two persons in its employ, I held in substance -on an application made to me sitting at chambers for a temporary injunction that the canal property owned and operated by the defendant was affected with a public interest and that the defendant’s operation thereof was subject to that interest. New York Cement Company v. Consolidated Eosendale Cement Company, 37 Misc. Rep. 746. Immediately subsequent to that decision the defendant posted notices along the canal property affected by that action and this, reading…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. . O'BrienNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. New York Cement Co. v. Consolidated Rosendale Cement Co.New York Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. New York Cement Co. v. Consolidated Rosendale Cement Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API