Legal Opinion
New York Cement Co. v. Consolidated Rosendale Cement Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 15, 1902PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Motion for a temporary injunction.
1Opinion of the Court
Betts, J".
In the year 1823, by chapter 238, the Legislature of the State of New York incorporated the Delaware & Hudson Canal Company for the purpose of constructing a canal or slack water navigation between the Hudson and Delaware rivers giving to said corporation power of eminent domain for the purpose of acquiring land for the purpose of constructing said canal and necessary to its use and provided among other things, that for the purpose of supplying said canal with water, said corporation might divert the waters of the Delaware and Hudson rivers and of other streams.
The canal was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- McEntee v. . Kingston Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Selden v. . the Del. Hud. Canal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1864
- Sterne v. Metropolitan Telephone & Telegraph Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wright v. Glen Telephone Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
- New York Cement Co. v. Consolidated Rosendale Cement Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1904
- New York Cement Co. v. Consolidated Rosendale Cement Co.New York Supreme Court · 1902