Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Qureshi

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 7, 2000No. 1980160 and 1980179PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The question presented by these petitions for the writ of mandamus is whether certain records of Vaughan Regional Medical Center, Inc. ("Vaughan Regional"), relating to a staff physician are privileged under state law and, therefore, not subject to discovery. The trial judge held that some of the records were discoverable, but that some of them were not discoverable because, he said, the discovery request was "overly broad." To the extent that the trial court ordered that the records were discoverable, we conclude that he erred. Therefore, we grant the petitions of Dr. F.H. Qureshi, Central…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. WuIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Shelton v. Morehead Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Cruger v. LoveSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  4. Tucson Medical Center, Incorporated v. MisevchArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Humana Hospital Desert Valley v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Ex Parte AndersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  2. Ex Parte Coosa Valley Health Care, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  3. Ex Parte CryerSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  4. Marshall v. PlanzDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2001
  5. Roby v. Fairfield Nursing & Rehabilitation Center, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2009

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API