Legal Opinion
Abrams v. New York City Transit Authority
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 28, 1974PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtJacob Markowitz, J.
The stated purpose of this article 78 proceeding is to compel respondents to comply with the laws controlling noise in the New York City subways. Toward that end, petitioners, as individuals and in various official and representative capacities seek an order directing the New York City Transit Authority and the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (hereinafter referred to as M. T. A.) and their members “ to turn over immediately to petitioner, Robert Abrams ” the reports required by certain sections of the Public Authorities Law, and setting down the petition for hearing.
In opposition,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Schieffelin v. Valentine KomfortNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
- Roosevelt v. . DraperNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
- Zara Contracting Co. v. CohenNew York Supreme Court · 1964
- Silverberg v. Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 18New York Supreme Court · 1969
- Carnegie v. RonanNew York Supreme Court · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Abrams v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975