Higgs v. State
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
222 P.3d 648 (2010)
Chaz HIGGS, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Nevada, Respondent.
No. 49883.
Supreme Court of Nevada.
January 14, 2010.
Law Office of David R. Houston and David R. Houston, Reno; Richard F. Cornell, Reno, for Appellant.
Catherine Cortez Masto, Attorney General, Carson City; Richard A. Gammick, District Attorney, and Terrence P. McCarthy, Deputy District Attorney, Washoe County, for Respondent.
Peter Chase Neumann, Reno, for Amicus Curiae Nevada Justice Association.
BEFORE THE COURT EN BANC.[1]
OPINION
By the Court, HARDESTY, J.:
In this appeal, appellant Chaz Higgs challenges his conviction…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Cherry; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Saitta.
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.