Legal Opinion

Sewing-Machine Co. v. Frame

United States Circuit Court

Decided May 19, 1884PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Equity.

1Opinion of the CourtButler, J.

The plaintiff, having acquired title to Shorey’s patent for cutting and trimming attachment for sewing-machines, issued March 28,1882, charges the defendant with infringement. The claim of the patent is in the following language: “The combination, substantially as herein described, with stitch-forming mechanism, of a rotary cutter having its cutting edge or edges eccentric. ” The specifications indicate the state of the art and the result sought by the inventor, and describé the invention reached, so well that we cannot do better than to adopt and insert the language here:

*597“Cutting or trimming…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Miller v. Brass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Penfield v. Chambers Bros. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1899
  2. Beach v. American Box-Machine Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1894
  3. Moist Cold Refrigerator Co. v. Lou Johnson Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
  4. Moist Cold Refrigerator Co. v. Lou Johnson Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  5. Day v. Aabling-Ebright Seed Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API