Legal Opinion
Day v. Aabling-Ebright Seed Co.
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided March 20, 1916No. 70Published
In Equity. Suit by John Mills Day against the Aabling-Fbright Seed Company. On final hearing. Decree for complainant.
1Opinion of the Court
NETERER, District Judge.
Complainant charges defendant with infringing a device for watering chicks, covered by his letters patent No. 727,597, in which he makes the following claims:
“1. In an automatic watering device, the combination of a jar or bottle, with the top so constructed that a cap may be screwed upon it, a pan with tho. bottom raised toward the center, an inverted screw cap for said jar secured to said pan near the center of its raised bottom, with an opening through said inverted screw cap near the perimeter of the lower part of the same, said opening being lower than the sides…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rose v. HirshCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1896
- Sewing-Machine Co. v. FrameUnited States Circuit Court · 1884
- Day v. Chas. H. Lilly Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1915