Legal Opinion

Nettles v. Sottile

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 14, 1937No. 14465PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Bonham.

Judge Bellinger heard this case and has written an able decree, which will be reported, and which states so clearly the cardinal facts and issues involved, as to make it unnecessary to make a preliminary statement of them.

It is only necessary to say that the plaintiff brought the action, as Receiver, to recover of the defendants, as stockholders of the Peoples State Bank of South Carolina, now in process of liquidation, the stockholder’s liability imposed upon them as such stockholders.

The defendants, by answer, set up various…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Alderman v. AldermanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
  2. Barbour v. ThomasDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1933
  3. Harris Investment Co. v. HoodSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  4. Meyer v. BrunsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1916

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. McSweeney v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1942
  2. Nettles v. RhettCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
  3. Nettles v. ChildsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1939
  4. Lancaster v. Smithco, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
  5. Parker Peanut Company v. FelderSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1942

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API