Legal Opinion

City of San Antonio v. MacKey

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 17, 1896PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES, Associate Justice.

Appellee, owner of several lots in the city limits, brought suit against the city for damages to his property arising from the use for a number of years of certain of his lots and other lots as a dumping place for refuse matter.

The petition alleged that on one of plaintiff’s lots (No. 178), containing twenty-four acres, he had his residence, and that defendant had deposited on plaintiff’s other lots and on adjacent lots belonging to others, carcasses of dead animals, decayed animal and vegetable matter, night soil, garbage, filth and refuse matter of every description…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gainesville, Henrietta & Western Railway Co. v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Rosenthal v. Taylor, Bastrop & Houston Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1891
  3. City of Fort Worth v. CrawfordTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  4. City of Fort Worth v. CrawfordTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Robertson v. CatesTexas Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Brewster v. City of ForneyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1920
  2. City of Fort Worth v. GeorgeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  3. City of Austin v. BushCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. City of Paris v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  5. City of Harrisonville, Mo. v. WS Dickey Clay Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API