Legal Opinion
City of Harrisonville, Mo. v. WS Dickey Clay Mfg. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided August 5, 1932No. 9241PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CANT, District Judge.
The parties will he designated as in the court below, where W. S. Dickey Clay Manufacturing Company was plaintiff, and city of Harrisonville was defendant.
Plaintiff is a corporation organized under the laws 'of the stale of Delaware. Defendant is now, and for several years last past has been, a city of about 2,000 inhabitants in the state of Missouri. A small stream, known as Town creek, flows through or near the northerly line of said city and takes its course westerly and southerly near the westerly line thereof. During some periods, this stream is nearly, or quite dry.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Missouri v. Illinois & the Sanitary DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Seifert v. . City of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Haskell v. City of New BedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Finney v. BerrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
- Winchell v. City of WaukeshaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Arcelay v. Sánchez MartínezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1955
- Storley v. Armour & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
- Stratford Theater, Inc. v. Town of StratfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- City of Jackson v. KeaneMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
- Petition of New Jersey Barging CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.