State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Chicago Mill & Lumber Corp.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Johnson, C. J.,
(after stating the facts). As indicated in the statement of facts, this is the second appeal in this case. By referring to the former opinion, it will he found that the State brought suit against the Chicago Mill & Lumber Corporation and the Paepcke Corporation, two foreign corporations, to recover hack taxes alleged to be due for the years 1927 to 1930, both inclusive, by reason of gross undervaluation in the assessments of the machinery and manufactured lumber at the mills of said corporation at West Helena and Blytheville, Arkansas. This court held that there was no personal…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- White River Lumber Co. v. Arkansas Ex Rel. ApplegateSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- State ex rel. Moose v. Kansas City & Memphis Railway & Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
- White River Lumber Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
3Cited by6 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
- Southwestern Distilled Products Co. v. State Ex Rel. HumphreySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
- Fleming v. RolfeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
- Jensen v. Dierks Lumber Coal CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.