Legal Opinion

Department of Corrections v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 9, 2007No. 58447-2-IPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*601¶1 — In its postsentence petition, the Department of Corrections (DOC) contends that trial courts may not impose exceptional terms of community custody. Washington courts, however, have disagreed, interpreting the trial court’s statutory authority to impose exceptional sentences to include exceptional community custody terms. Thus, we deny the petition.

Coleman, J.

FACTS

¶2 Christopher Smith pleaded guilty to first degree rape of a child. Smith’s standard sentencing range was 93 to 163 months. Because of Smith’s developmental delays, both his counsel and the prosecutor acknowledged to the court…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. State v. ShoveWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. CoeWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. BernhardWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. GuerinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. MathersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  2. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  3. In Re SmithCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  4. State v. MahoneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  5. State v. MahoneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API