Legal Opinion

State v. Mahone

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 27, 2011No. Nos. 40689-6-II; 40699-3-IIPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHunt, J.

¶[1 Sylvester James Mahone appeals two consecutive 240-day penalties imposed for four violations of his post-confinement community supervision and community placement portions of sentences for two separate convictions. He argues that former RCW 9.94A.200 (1994) authorized the superior court to impose only a single confinement period of 240 days, based on four consecutive multiple 60-day penalties for the four acts that constituted the violations of both community terms. In his Statement of Additional Grounds (SAG),1 Mahone alleges several due process violations, all of which fail. Agreeing…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Berger v. SonnelandWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Berger v. SonnelandWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Western Telepage, Inc. v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Western Telepage, Inc. v. City of Tacoma Department of FinancingWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. TaplinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State of Washington v. Joe Anthony MataCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API