Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Bellmead v. Torres

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 2002No. 01-0299Published

1DissentJustice Hankinson

Under the Court’s interpretation today of our recreational use statute, Tex. Civ. *616PRAC. & Rem.Code §§ 75.001-004, the fact that someone is outside when he or she is injured is the sole fact triggering that statute’s limitation of liability on the part of the landowner. The Legislature did not, however, draft such a broad exception to the traditional duties of care owed entrants on land; instead it circumscribed the limitation on liability by, among other things, defining “recreation” with a detailed list of activities. Id. § 75.001(3). While that list is not exhaustive, it must have some…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Dallas v. MitchellTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  2. City of Lubbock v. Rule, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2002
  3. McMillan v. Parker, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1995
  4. Martinez v. Harris County, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1991
  5. Lipton v. Wilhite, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API