McMillan v. Parker
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
1Opinion of the Court
JONES, Justice.
Appellant Kay McMillan sued appellee Richard Parker to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained as a result of Parker’s negligence. Based on its interpretation of the Texas “recreational-use statute,” Tex.Civ.Prac. & Rem.Code Ann. §§ 75.001-.003 (West 1986 & Supp.1995), the trial court rendered summary judgment in favor of Parker. McMillan contends on appeal that the trial court erred in its application of the statute to the facts of this case and that material issues of fact exist with regard to the duties Parker owed her. We will reverse the summary judgment…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Gulbenkian v. PennTexas Supreme Court · 1952
- Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. v. Glyn-JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Lunsford v. City of BryanTexas Supreme Court · 1957
- Lipton v. Wilhite, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995
3Cited by18 opinions
- Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Lely Development Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2002
- Herrin v. Medical Protective Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2002
- Martinez v. RossCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2020
- Howard v. East Texas Baptist University, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003
- STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF PARKS v. Shumake, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2004
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.