Legal Opinion
Patilla v. Freudenberg-NOK General Partnership
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided October 4, 2022No. 3:20-cv-00087Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Lisimba Patilla, Case No. 3:20-cv-87 Plaintiff, v. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Freudenberg-NOK General Partnership, Defendant. I. INTRODUCTION On January 15, 2020, Plaintiff Lisimba Patilla filed a complaint against his former employer Defendant Freudenberg-NOK General Partnership alleging race discrimination and retaliation under both federal and state law. (Doc. No. 1). On November 19, 2022, Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment as to all of Patilla’s claims. (Doc. No. 17). Patilla opposed the motion,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Shirley J. MITCHELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOLEDO HOSPITAL, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- 60 Ivy Street Corporation (86-5500), and Coldwell Banker Commercial Group, Inc., (86-5517) v. R.C. Alexander and Doris AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.