United States v. Challoner
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TACHA, Circuit Judge.
Dale Challoner, a federal prisoner, filed a habeas petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 alleging ineffective assistance of counsel and violation of the Double Jeopardy Clause. The district court denied his petition. This court granted a certificate of appealability (“COA”) on the issue of “whether Mr. Challoner’s sentence on Count 14, which charged a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 844(h), violates the Double Jeopardy Clause.” Our jurisdiction arises under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2253, and we AFFIRM.
I. BACKGROUND
This court summarized the background of this case on direct appeal.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Smith v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Byrd v. WorkmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Hooks v. WorkmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Grant v. RoyalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- Littlejohn v. TrammellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Ellis v. RaemischCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.