Legal Opinion
State v. Ratushny
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 9, 1964PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
82 N.J. Super. 499 (1964)
198 A.2d 131
THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
HAROLD RATUSHNY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued February 10, 1964.
Decided March 9, 1964.
Before Judges CONFORD, FREUND and SULLIVAN.
Mr. H. Douglas Stine, Union County Prosecutor, argued the cause for appellant.
Mr. Leo Kaplowitz argued the cause for respondent.
The opinion of the court was delivered by FREUND, J.A.D.
The State was granted leave to appeal an order of the Union County Court to quash a search warrant and to suppress the evidence obtained in pursuance…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Lustig v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- State v. MacriSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
- United States v. InnelliDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. ParsonsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
- State v. MarshallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
- State v. ChristyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
- Perez v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
- State v. AielloNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.