Legal Opinion

Becker v. Fisher

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1925No. 18385PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

In this case a conclusion was reached concerning the construction of this will at the last term of this court, and, a motion for a rehearing having been sustained, it was resubmitted upon the briefs of counsel. With great respect for the determinations heretofore reached, the writer entertains the following views concerning matters in issue herein.

The paramount question involved is whether or not the so-called charitable trusts created by item 5 of the will of Sarah Hawes, and the codicil referring to that item, are valid charitable trusts. Item 5 of the will provides:

“I give, devise and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Dulles's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  2. Thorp v. LundMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  3. Fosdick v. . Town of HempsteadNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Rotch v. EmersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  5. Franklin v. HastingsIllinois Supreme Court · 1911

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Estate of BunnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. McDonald & Co. Securities, Inc. v. Alzheimer's Disease & Related Disorders Ass'nOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Hess v. SommersOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Heinlein v. Elyria Savings & Trust Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1945
  5. Bunnell v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API