State v. Stone
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HUDSON, Justice.
We examine today whether a passenger in a vehicle who gave consent to a generic search for weapons or drugs during a routine *51traffic stop subjected himself to an officer’s flashlight search inside his underwear. Under the circumstances here, we conclude he did not. We hold that this intrusion violated the defendant’s rights under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which protects all persons from unreasonable searches and seizures, and entitles defendant Stone to a new trial;
Defendant was indicted for possession with intent to sell or deliver cocaine.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Brendlin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. RomanoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2017
- State v. BattleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
- State v. LaddCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.