Legal Opinion

In re the Succession of Carroll

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 15, 1876No. 4730PublishedCited by 5 opinions

from the Second District Court, parish of Orleans. Tissot, J.

1Opinion of the CourtMohgan, J.

The object of this suit is to annul the will of Mary Carroll on several grounds; among others, that the pretended will, which is in the nuncupative form, by public act, is not signed by the testatrix. The notary declares that the testatrix, being illiterate, has made •her mark.

Upon this part of the case, tho only one necessary for us to consider, the district judge has, in support of his judgment, which annuls th.e will, given reasons which are entirely satisfactory, and we adopt them: We agree with him, also, in his conclusion that there is no necessity for an administration, tho rights of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Le Blanc v. Baras's HeirsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1840
  2. Lewis' Heirs v. HisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1833

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Succession of MichieLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
  2. Oglesby v. TurnerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
  3. Succession of NelsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
  4. Duhon v. DuhonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  5. Bihm v. BihmSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API