Batten v. Richards
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Dane County. The following statement of the ease was prepared by Mr. Justice Tayloh as a part of the opinion: This is a garnishee action commenced by the plaintiff, Batten, against B. T. Biehards.
Read the full summary
APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Dane County. The following statement of the ease was prepared by Mr. Justice Tayloh as a part of the opinion: This is a garnishee action commenced by the plaintiff, Batten, against B. T. Biehards. The garnishment is upon a judgment in favor of the plaintiff against Richard S. Smith and George J. Smith, and the garnishee summons was issued after judgment in favor of Batten against said Smiths, and execution issued upon said judgment against the said Smiths. The Smiths were merchants. They had failed in business, and made a voluntary assignment in favor of…
1Opinion of the CourtTayloe, J.
Most, if not all, the material questions discussed by the appellant on this appeal, and which he insists were wrongly decided by the trial court, were discussed by the appellant and decided against him on a former appeal from the judgment of the circuit court upon a traverse of the affidavit for an attachment, which was issued in the original action of the appellant against the said Smiths, and upon which attachment the property in the hands of the present garnishee, as assignee of said Smiths, was at-*275tachecl. The affidavit upon which. the attachment was issued alleged that the defendants the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Batten v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
- Steinlein v. HalsteadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
- Farwell v. GundryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
- Mather v. McMillanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
- Smith v. BowenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lawson v. StacyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
- Mullen v. ReinigWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
- Marlin v. TeichgraeberSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901