Mather v. McMillan
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Monroe County. Replevin. The facts are stated in the opinion. Counsel for the respondent cited: Farwell v. Gundry, 52 Wis., 268; Stein-lein v. Dalstead, id., 289; Wadleigh v. Merlde, 57 id., 517; Iluloen v. Ilarshaw, 59 id., 403.
1Opinion of the CourtOrtoN, J.
The complaint alleges that the firm, of T. P. Wither & Co., on the loth day of September, 1883, made an assignment of their property, both real and personal, to the plaintiff, for the benefit of their creditors, and all the conditions required by the statute were complied with to make the assignment valid on that day. On the 25th day of the same month, the assignors completed and made a correct inventory of their assets and list of their creditors, as required by law, and on the same day such inventory and list were duly verified by their affidavit, and certified to be correct by the said…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Steinlein v. HalsteadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
- Farwell v. GundryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
- Haben v. HarshawWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by5 opinions
- Batten v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
- Glanton v. . JacobsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- Williams v. CrockerSupreme Court of Florida · 1895
- Batten v. RichardsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
- Connor v. Omaha National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1894