Legal Opinion

Mendoza v. McKnight

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 8, 2001No. 99-35091Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

William Mark McKnight (“McKnight”) appeals the district court judgment in favor of Delegario Lemos-Mendoza (“Mendoza”) on a legal malpractice action.

On May 22, 1996, Mendoza filed a malpractice action against McKnight. On December 18,1996, McKnight filed a Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition. Upon learning of the bankruptcy filing, the district court dismissed the malpractice case pursuant to the automatic stay provisions set forth in 11 U.S.C. § 362(a).

In March 1997, Mendoza informed the district court that no record of a bankruptcy petition filed by McKnight existed. In light of this…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Gilbert G. BEEZLEY, Debtor. Gilbert G. BEEZLEY, Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE COMPANY, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  2. Pavelich v. McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Wayte & Carruth LLP (In Re Pavelich)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  3. In Re: Robert Wayne DunbarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. Contractors' State License Board of California v. DunbarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API