Legal Opinion
Kahaulelio v. Ihihi
Hawaii Supreme Court
Decided March 17, 1919No. 1110PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Petition for Writ of Error and Supersedeas Returnable to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION.
Judgment in this cause was rendered in favor of plaintiff-defendant in error, and the defendant-plaintiff in error, Beke Ihihi, lias applied to me for the allowance of a writ of error from the United States circuit court of appeals of the ninth circuit. The plaintiff-defendant in error, Kahaulelio, by his attorney, J. Lightfoot, Esq., has interposed an objection to the issuance of the Avrit on the ground that the amount involved does not exceed the sum of $5000 as required by section 1126A, Vol. 2, U. S. Comp. Stat.
By leave, first granted, both parties have submitted…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Red River Cattle Co. v. NeedhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Wilson v. BlairSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Enriquez v. EnriquezSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rhoades v. MacielHawaii Supreme Court · 1920