Legal Opinion · Dissent

184 West 10th Street Corp. v. Marvits

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided November 20, 2007Published

1Dissent

McCooe, J. (dissenting).

I respectfully dissent and accept the tenant’s testimony in its entirety. Nevertheless, I disagree that the tenant has sustained her burden of proof that the cats were displayed “openly and notoriously” and that the landlords, past or present, had knowledge that she was harboring cats. I disagree that if the independent contractor or its employees had knowledge that it would be imputed to the landlord. I agree *56that if the landlord’s agents or employees had knowledge it would be imputed to the landlord.

Administrative Code of City of New York § 27-2009.1 (b) provides in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bingham v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Seward Park Housing Corp. v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. 318 East 93, L. L. C. v. WardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. Robinson v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Gidina Partners LLC v. MarcoAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API