Legal Opinion

Gidina Partners LLC v. Marco

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided December 29, 2005PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*22OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Final judgment entered on or about May 19, 2004 reversed, with $30 costs, and matter remanded for further proceedings consistent with this decision.

Even when viewed in the light most favorable to the tenants, the trial evidence fails to establish that landlord waived its right to enforce the “no-pets” provision of the governing lease agreement (see Administrative Code of City of NY § 27-2009.1 [b]). While tenant Marco testified that he “never hid” his dog— described in the record as a “quiet,” 19-pound Schnauzer — he offered scant evidence on the critical “open and…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Seward Park Housing Corp. v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. 184 West 10th Street Corp. v. MarvitsAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2007
  2. 184 West 10th Street Corp. v. MarvitsAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2007
  3. 184 West 10th Street Corp. v. MarvitsAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API