Legal Opinion

State v. Schimpf

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

Decided March 23, 1989PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BIRCH, Judge.

Fredrick Schimpf, the defendant, appeals by right from a conviction of aggravated sexual battery. He is serving a Range II twenty-year sentence.

Defendant’s more significant issues include an attack upon the constitutionality of the statute under which he was convicted, and the insistence that the trial judge erroneously admitted certain expert testimony. In eight additional issues, the defendant contends that

1. The presentment fails to provide sufficient information for the preparation of a defense;

2. The presentment should have been dismissed for failure of the Department…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  4. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State v. BallardTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  2. McDaniel v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  3. STATE of Tennessee v. DeWayne COLLIER AKA Patrick CollierTennessee Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Steward v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API