Legal Opinion

Marx v. Bell, Moore & Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 15, 1872PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Mobile, Tried before Hon. John Elliott. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion,

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, C. J.

This action was brought by the appellees, Bell, Moore & Co., against the appellant, Isaac Marx, to recover one thousand dollars, advanced in fact to appellant’s brother, now deceased, Henry Marx, on the written order of said deceased, but by the appellees alleged to have been advanced on the request of defendant, and solely and exclusively on his credit, and that he, and not Henry Marx, was the real debtor. This was denied by the defendant, who insisted that the money was advanced to his said brother on his own credit, and that, at most, he was the mere guarantor or surety of his said…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sanford v. HowardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1857
  2. Boykin v. Dohlonde & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1861
  3. Ortez v. Jewett & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1853
  4. Scott v. MyattSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854
  5. Shields v. CunninghamIndiana Supreme Court · 1820

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Moore v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Webb v. Hawkins Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  3. Danley v. Marshall Lumber and Mill CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  4. Western Union Tel. Co. v. GriffithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  5. J. Zimmern's Co. v. GranadeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API